Exequity
  • Home
  • Advisory Services
  • Consultants
  • Newsroom
  • Careers
  • Contact

SEC Issues Final Amendments for Rule 10b5-1 Trading Plans

1/9/2023

 
On December 14, 2022, the SEC released final amendments to the Rule 10b5-1 trading plans. Rule 10b5-1 provides an affirmative defense to insider trading for individuals and issuers that trade stock under a plan entered in good faith at a time when they do not possess material nonpublic information. The final amendments provide additional requirements in order to avail oneself of the affirmative defense to insider trading allegations.

Click here to download the Client Alert in PDF.

SEC Issues Final Pay Versus Performance Rules

8/31/2022

 
On August 25, 2022, the SEC issued its final pay versus performance (PVP) rules under Section 953(a) of the Dodd-Frank Act, effective for proxy and information statements covering fiscal years ending on or after December 16, 2022. Thus, these new rules will generally apply to proxy statements filed in 2023.

These final PVP rules impose new disclosure requirements on public companies. This Client Alert reviews these new disclosure requirements and offers Exequity's comments on them, as well as provides next steps for companies to take now before the traditional proxy drafting starts later this year.

Click here to download the Client Alert in PDF.

Board Committee Oversight of ESG

3/16/2022

 
In this Client Briefing, Exequity explores the distribution of ESG oversight within board committee charters across S&P 100 companies. We examine overall prevalence of ESG responsibility, different areas of ESG oversight, and how ESG focus areas are allocated between committees.
 
Key findings include:
  • 93 of the S&P 100 have at least one board committee with ESG oversight
  • 75% of nominating and corporate governance committees maintain ESG responsibilities, most commonly Environment and Sustainability
  • 61% of compensation committees have ESG responsibilities, typically limited to oversight of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, including pay equity
  • 31% establish oversight over ESG responsibilities to a separate committee

Click here to download the Client Briefing in PDF.

SEC Proposes New Rules for Rule 10b5-1 Trading Plans and Share Repurchases

12/22/2021

 
This Client Alert looks at the proposed rules released by the SEC on December 15, 2021 regarding Rule 10b5-1 trading plans and company share repurchases. The SEC is proposing new requirements for the use of Rule 10b5-1 trading plans on both those adopting such plans and the company whose securities are covered by such plans. Regarding company share repurchases, the SEC has proposed new reporting requirements, including a new form. 

The SEC is accepting comments for 45 days after the proposed rules are published in the Federal Register.

Click here to download the Client Alert in PDF.

Glass Lewis and ISS Publish 2022 Policy Updates

12/17/2021

 
This Client Alert looks at the newly published policy updates for the 2022 proxy season from Glass Lewis and ISS.

Glass Lewis's updates apply starting January 1, 2022, while ISS's policy updates apply to shareholder meetings held on and after February 1, 2022. Neither Glass Lewis nor ISS announced any significant compensation-related policy changes for 2022.

Click here to download the Client Alert in PDF.

2021 Relative TSR Prevalence and Design of S&P 500 Companies

11/9/2021

 
​In this Client Briefing, Exequity explores the usage of relative total shareholder return (RTSR) within long-term incentive plans across S&P 500 companies. We examine overall prevalence of RTSR, differences in usage between industry sectors, and key design elements of these plans. ​ 

Key findings:
  • 62% of S&P 500 companies use RTSR (up 2% from 2020)
  • RTSR usage as a modifier increased 5% to 28% for 2021
  • 72% use a focused peer group and 28% use a broad index
  • 22% use the S&P 500 as the RTSR peer group

​Click here to download the Client Briefing in PDF.

Glass Lewis's Approach to Executive Pay Responses to COVID-19

2/9/2021

 
In late January 2021, Glass Lewis provided additional guidance with respect to how it may approach executive pay responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. Previously, Glass Lewis had provided some guidance, but it has now launched a dedicated web page to COVID-19 and issued additional guidance concerning how COVID-19 may impact its analyses under its various policies. This Client Alert summarizes the key guidance that Glass Lewis recently provided, which companies should review as they prepare their 2021 proxy statements.

Click HERE to download the Client Alert in PDF.

ISS's and Glass Lewis's 2021 Policy Updates

12/22/2020

 
Both ISS and Glass Lewis recently released their policy updates for 2021. Surprisingly, neither ISS's nor Glass Lewis's policy updates had any major policy changes with respect to compensation. This Client Alert details the policy updates of both ISS and Glass Lewis, even those not necessarily presented as policy updates that will nevertheless have an impact on compensation matters for the 2021 proxy season.

Click HERE to download the Client Alert in PDF.

SEC Issues Final Rules Impacting Proxy Advisors

8/4/2020

 
This Client Alert looks at the final rules impacting proxy advisors that the SEC adopted July 22, 2020. The Client Alert discusses the SEC action to codify that "solicitation" includes providing proxy vote recommendations, modifications of the anti-fraud provision to address failure of proxy advisors to disclose material information, the implications of these changes for proxy advisors, and details of the "safe harbor" proxy advisors can use to avoid having to comply with the proxy voting rules.

The final rules are effective 60 days after publication in the Federal Register. However, the final rules do not apply to proxy advisors until December 1, 2021.

Click here to download the Client Alert​ in PDF.

2020 Relative TSR Prevalence and Design of S&P 500 Companies

7/14/2020

 
​In this Client Briefing, Exequity explores the usage of relative total shareholder return (RTSR) within long-term incentive plans across S&P 500 companies. We examine overall prevalence of RTSR, differences in usage between industry sectors, and key design elements of these plans. ​ 

Key findings:
  • 60% of S&P 500 companies use RTSR (up 2% from 2019)
  • RTSR prevalence exceeds 40% for each S&P 500 sector for the first time
  • RTSR usage as a modifier increased 2% to 23% for 2020
  • 73% use a focused peer group and 27% use a broad index
  • 23% use the S&P 500 as the RTSR peer group

​Click here to download the Client Briefing in PDF.

Making Your Bonus Plan Work

5/11/2020

 
Seemingly overnight, the COVID-19 pandemic gripped the World, and many business forecasts and operating budgets were severely impacted. Before the end of the first quarter, incentive plan performance goals were suddenly deemed unattainable. While most companies are not currently considering adjusting in-cycle incentive plan performance goals, due either to concerns about external optics or a lack of sufficient context, assessing performance for the purposes of incentive plan payouts will be a deeply deliberated topic during year-end pay discussions.  We expect that for many companies, incentive plan performance assessment is likely to include the application of backward-looking discretion, informed by a comprehensive review of a variety of quantitative and qualitative factors.  This article provides an analytical approach to support the application of discretion.

Click here to download the Client Briefing in PDF

2020 Director Equity Grant Practices

5/7/2020

 
The significant stock price declines of many companies over the past few months have raised the question of whether a company’s traditional approach to impending equity awards should be revised. The first widescale evidence of companies’ responses to this dynamic is unfolding in the context of 2020 director equity awards. This Client Alert analyzes the equity grant practices of 109 S&P 500 companies holding their annual meetings between April 1, 2020 and May 1, 2020 to identify trends in director equity grant policies resulting from the market impact of COVID-19. 

Click here to download​ the Client Alert in PDF.

One Approach to Making Your 2020 Bonus Plan Work

4/13/2020

 

Do you think the effect of COVID-19 has destroyed your company’s 2020 bonus plan? Many companies are taking a “wait and see” approach to how they will ultimately evaluate the impact of the pandemic on incentive plan performance goals.  When the time is right, that assessment is likely to include the application of backward-looking discretion, informed by a comprehensive review of a variety of quantitative and qualitative factors. However, many companies will likely be uncomfortable with both the ambiguity of an undefined and arbitrary “discretionary” review process, and the well-established negative connotations associated with the exercise of discretion in setting pay. As a result, many companies will be looking for well-reasoned, easily articulated approaches to applying discretion. This Client Alert offers one example of the analytical approach that companies may consider in evaluating 2020 performance while maintaining pre-COVID-19 performance frameworks.​

Click here to download this Client Alert in PDF.

A Framework for Discretion

4/8/2020

 
The economic fallout resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic has rendered obsolete many executive incentive plans, and compensation committees are expected to apply significantly more discretion for 2020 than is typical. This Client Briefing provides a framework for the use of discretion in incentive plans.  A logical framework may help companies avoid arbitrary and confusing outcomes. 

Click here to download this Client Briefing in PDF.

COVID-19 Impact on Pay: Summary Statistics

4/2/2020

 
Picture
Last Updated: June 3, 2020

Note: Contact your Exequity Advisor for detailed information underlying these summary statistics and for special data cuts.

How COVID-19 is Impacting Pay

4/2/2020

 
While it is safe to say every economic crisis is different, it does not seem fair to compare this crisis to any other. The global impact of the COVID-19 pandemic is unprecedented in modern times. In turn, companies are responding with unprecedented actions. This Client Alert describes how the repercussions of COVID-19 are impacting pay programs, based on data gathered from public filings as of April 1, 2020. We will continue to update this data throughout the pandemic as companies respond, at https://www.exqty.com/newsroom/covid-19-impact-on-pay-summary-statistics.

Click here to download this Client Alert in PDF​

Glass Lewis' and ISS' 2020 Policy Updates

11/21/2019

 
Recently, both Glass Lewis and ISS issued their U.S. policy updates for the 2020 proxy season. None of the updates are significant in and of themselves but are likely to impact a select group of companies that have not yet acted with respect to current corporate governance best practices.

This Client Alert looks at both the Glass Lewis and ISS updates as well as ISS' preliminary compensation FAQs.

Click Here to download the Client Alert in PDF.

Trends in Relative TSR Presentation to NASPP Michigan, Including Russell 3000 Auto & Components Statistics

11/20/2019

 
Ben Burney spoke to the Michigan chapter of NASPP about trends in relative TSR. Topics covered include overall prevalence and peer group usage, among others. The presentation also included new RTSR statistics from Russell 3000 Automobile and Components companies. 

Download the presentation here.

SEC Proposed Changes to Rules Impacting Proxy Advisors and Shareholder Proposals

11/12/2019

 
On November 5, 2019, the SEC met and issued two sets of proposed changes to existing rules. One impacts proxy advisors (known in SEC-speak as "proxy voting advice businesses"), such as Institutional Shareholder Services, Inc. and Glass, Lewis & Co., and the other proposed rule impacts the requirements for shareholders to submit proposals.

This Client Alert summarizes these proposed rule changes.

Click here to download this Client Alert.

Valuing Amazon—Using Its Financials

10/23/2019

 
In this Client Update, we suggest that compensation committees and boards should have confidence in using their business judgment to identify key measures for evaluating company performance in incentive plans. Using reported earnings measures highlighted by Amazon.com, Inc., we provide a demonstration of how financial performance can be very closely tied to shareholder value creation over time. We also compare EVA (ISS’s latest preferred approach) to stock price over this same period. We find using Amazon’s reported financial performance to be a very strong gauge of shareholder value creation. If the Amazon example is any indication, compensation committees should feel comfortable in applying their own business judgment, rather than feeling the need to turn to ISS’s one-size-fits-all notion that EVA presides over all.
valuing_amazon_20191023.pdf
File Size: 249 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

<<Previous

    Subscribe to Exequity's Publications

    Lists*


    Learn more about Exequity publications an thought leadership 

    Categories

    All
    162(m)
    409A
    CEO Pay
    Change In Control
    Client Alert
    Client Briefing
    Client Update
    Compensation Design
    COVID 19
    Director Compensation
    Disclosure
    Dodd Frank
    Equity Plans
    ESG
    EVA
    FASB
    Glass Lewis
    Hedging
    Incentive Plan
    ISS
    Monte Carlo Simulations
    NQDC
    Pay For Performance
    Regulations
    Say On Pay
    SEC
    Speech
    Study
    Tax
    TSR

Services

Compensation Benchmarking, Program Design
Technical, Governance, Compliance

Transactions and Transitions

Company

Consultants
Newsroom
Exequity Tearsheet (PDF)

Contact

Careers
Offices

© COPYRIGHT 2022. EXEQUITY LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
  • Home
  • Advisory Services
  • Consultants
  • Newsroom
  • Careers
  • Contact